In the early days, many log cabins were considered as only temporary shelters,
  something to get by in until a “real” house could be built. Consequently a
  lot of shortcuts were taken, especially with the underpinnings. The pioneer
  in a hurry just dug a shallow furrow in the ground, dropped the first course
  of logs in, and packed the earth around them. The floor of the cabin was often
  packed earth as well. Many of the pioneers took the process a step further
  by placing a few stones on a level patch of ground and resting the first course
  of logs upon them. This worked a little better, but the stones eventually sank
  down and left the first course on the ground anyway. The next improvement was a trench dug a couple of feet deep, in which
      was built what amounted to a low stone wall. This was ex tended a foot
      or so above grade level and the cabin rested on a more or less solid foundation.
      Today, though, our building styles and standards, not to mention building
      codes, demand a more stable and substantial foundation under our houses. There are a number of different kinds of foundations that are suitable
      for log houses, and no one is markedly better than another. Any of them
      will do the job, and selection rests upon local building codes, house design,
      building site conditions, and personal preferences. 
     TYPES
    You have five basic options as far as foundation types are concerned, and you can use any combination of them beneath different parts of the
      house if that seems desirable. 
    The first and simplest variety is the open foundation in which the building
      rests upon a series of piers, piles, or posts spaced around the perimeter
      of the building and at certain interior points. The structure might be
      only 6 inches or so above grade level (not recommended because of lack
      of access) or might be elevated to a height of 3 or 4 feet or even more,
      with free air movement beneath the building. This style is not widely used
      for houses, mainly because of appearance, but is sometimes used for summer
      cottages, hunting camps, and storage buildings. The system is widely used
      for deck and porch support, too, especially those that extend out over
      a steep drop-off. This is the only foundation style that obviates any possibility
      of the buildup and infiltration of radon gasses into the structure. 
      
Fig. 4-1. Pier foundation skirted with re-sawn boards on a framework.  
    The second style is a modification of the first, with the house (or parts
      thereof) set on piers. Instead of being completely open, all spaces between
      grade level and the structure proper are filled in with some sort of nonstructural
      trim material, thus forming a skirted foundation (Fig. 4-1). Again, the
      structure may be low to the ground or high enough to provide a sizable
      crawl space underneath. 
    This is a satisfactory arrangement which combines low cost with a neat and attractive appearance, while affording some extra, dry storage space.
      The skirting material can be nearly anything. Textured plywood attached
      to a framework is often used, as is corrugated or patterned sheet metal
      roofing. Latticework was once very popular for this purpose and is still
      used to some extent. Other possibilities include stonework, planking, brick
      or imitation brick, and decorative concrete block. With complete skirting,
      provisions must be made for ventilating the area so as to prevent moisture
      buildup. This can be done by installing wood or metal louvers, sections
      of latticework, gratings, or other types of vents in the skirting. However,
      neither ground moisture nor surface water run off poses much of a problem
      for the foundation system itself (as is also true of the open foundation). 
    The third choice is a continuous-wall crawl space arrangement, which is
      today per haps the most popular of all. In this type of construction a
      continuous wall is built around the perimeter of the structure, extending
      from a below-grade level at or slightly below frostline (usually about
      2 to 4 feet deep but not less than 18 inches) to any suitable height above
      grade level (Fig. 4-2). The bottom of the house itself might be only a
      few inches above grade, or in some instances 3 feet or more. Or the distance
      can be varied all around the house by stepping the foundation. The continuous
      wall supports all the weight of a small structure, while in larger structures
      a portion of the weight is borne by girders, piers, or other support arrangements
      beneath the floor. The foundation may be made of poured concrete, concrete
      blocks, stone, brick, a specially treated wood foundation system, or various
      combinations of materials. As with the skirted foundation, suitable ventilation
      has to be provided to pre vent moisture buildup. 
      
Fig. 4-2. Note the piers for girder support used in conjunction with
      this typical continuous-wall crawl-sp foundation. 
    The fourth possibility is a full basement, and there are two varieties
      to consider. The choice of one or the other rests to a great degree on
      the topography of the building site and the design of the house. One type
      is the hole- in-the-ground basement, made by excavating to a depth of anywhere
      from about 5 to 8 feet over the entire area of the building footprint (the
      specific, outlined area that the building will cover when constructed).
      Then full-height walls are built around the perimeter of the structure,
      or that portion that will lie above a full basement. The foundation may
      rise to just above grade level, go up 2 or 3 feet, or be variably stepped.
      Some foundations contain no windows, while others can have small ones either
      exposed between grade level and the foundation top or set in wells sunk
      into the ground alongside the foundation walls. By far the greater proportion
      of the foundation is under ground on all sides of the house. 
    The other variety, a daylight or walk-in basement (also sometimes called
      a “garden level”), contains one or more walls that are al most or entirely
      exposed and above grade level (Fig. 4-3), an arrangement satisfactory on
      steeply sloping sites. Though these basements are built in essentially
      the same way and sup port the perimeter of the house, the exposed walls
      are fitted out with doors and windows and finish exterior siding, and from
      at least one direction actually become ground-level floors. 
      
Fig. 4-3. Any log house can be built on top of a daylight basement
        to gain an added level of living quarters.  
    Full basements of either type are most often built from poured concrete
      or concrete block. The exposed wall portions may be constructed of the
      same materials, or framed up with wood, or otherwise built in the same
      manner as the rest of the above-ground structure. Exposed masonry walls
      can later be veneered with brick, stone, or other building materials. Another
      possibility for constructing full basement walls is the Permanent Wood
      Foundation (PWF) system, which is rapidly gaining acceptance throughout
      the country. Stone and brick have also been used in the past for this purpose,
      but seldom are anymore. 
    And last, you might choose to build your house on a slab foundation (Fig.
      4-4). Slab foundations are made entirely from concrete poured onto a previously
      prepared surface, which is approximately at grade level. As with all foundations,
      this style has its advantages and disadvantages, and is a particularly
      popular method in the more temperate parts of the country. It can be successfully
      used, however, in any climate, and often forms an integral part of solar
      house designs. 
      
Fig. 4-4. A typical slab foundation arrangement.
  |