HOME Software Testing Data Mining and Warehousing |
Introduction It's said that 'two heads are better than one' and most would agree that it's easier to develop a new idea or to solve a difficult problem when you've got someone to work with. On a similar theme 'a problem shared is a problem halved' and 'many hands make light work'. These popular adages illustrate the great potential of team work. If channeled effectively, groups of people can pool their collective knowledge and experience to impressive effect. To tap into the immense potential of teamwork you'll need to be a facilitator and an enabler. By this, we mean someone who uses their people skills to make it easy for your colleagues to achieve their maximum contribution - both individually and as part of your team. You need to get collective, collaborative working happening in all kinds of ways. This will range from everyday events like one colleague bouncing an idea off another, through to larger-scale, set-piece events such as project meetings and workshops. Whichever way, a super project manager smoothes the path and makes it all possible. So although facilitation isn't traditionally found in the job description, we see it as one of the core competencies for super project management. Facilitation is a discipline in its own right, with its own specialist set of tools and techniques. Although it's not necessary to become an expert in the field, it's essential you're capable of facilitating project meetings and workshops. In this instance, your capabilities will make all the difference. As with the other people skills we've covered, facilitation is a well documented subject and your competency will grow with practice, experience and further research. Our aim here is to review the fundamentals of facilitation from a project perspective and to run through the practical techniques that we think every project manager should master. Project managers as facilitators Some people earn their living working exclusively as facilitators. Typically they're independent of projects - often brought in from outside the organization - dipping in and out when needed. They tend to be used to lead important workshops and high-profile meetings. However, in our experience, relatively few organizations employ their own full-time facilitators and only a small number bring in independent specialists on an occasional, as-needed basis. In fact, the vast majority of organizations don't use recognized facilitators at all. You might be lucky enough to have a specialist like this to run some of your key events. More often than not, though, you'll be expected to do this job at the same time as contributing to the discussion in some useful way. We don't see this as a problem. Although the Union will see our comments as close to outright heresy, we usually prefer to handle our own facilitation. A super project manager is quite capable of facilitating and has the added advantage of a first-hand understanding of what's good for the project in the widest sense. It's the best of both worlds and the organizational logistics are much simpler too! It shouldn't happen to a project manager (but it did) . . . A senior project manager was asked to deliver a session on the 'Fundamentals of Facilitation' as part of an internal training program. Two junior project managers were drafted in to help deliver the material - as training-within-training. Despite their nerves, the two newcomers got the presentation off to a flying start. They were just about to hand over to their senior colleague when a mobile phone rang. They watched in amazement as their mentor disappeared out of the room to take the call. Experienced managers aren't necessarily super facilitators. If you don't have a natural aptitude, you'll need to put effort into developing your skills. As we've said, though, there's much more to facilitation than running meetings. In fact, there's a touch of facilitation in everything you do as a project manager. For example, there are elements of facilitation in sorting out a dispute between two team members, just as there's a good measure of enabling in building an effective team. However, there are three everyday project situations in which your facilitation skills will be vital:
In the remainder of this chapter we're going to explore the principles behind facilitation and then pick out some practical techniques that can be used in these common project situations. Key principles behind successful facilitation You'll need to use your facilitation skills in all kinds of situations and fortunately there are some basic underlying principles that will always point you in the right direction. In any given circumstance, we recommend you set yourself four fundamental goals, each of which is critical to successful facilitation and deserves a closer look. Four fundamental facilitation goals
Providing a process The starting point for facilitation is to provide a suitable method for working on a particular problem or issue. By taking responsibility for defining the mechanics of how a piece of work is going to be done, you'll enable your attendees to focus their attention on the specifics of what needs to get done. You'll also put yourself in a good position to steer your colleagues towards an end result that's fit-for-purpose. On the flip side, the consequences of not providing a process are likely to be costly. Valuable time will be lost debating how the work should be tackled and the friction caused among the participants might result in an immediate setback to a successful outcome. Even worse, the team may try to tackle the task in a hit-and-miss fashion, disappearing off on tangents and stumbling into dead ends. The process you introduce will provide a series of logical steps for resolving a problem or making a decision. It will be tailored to your project situation and may be influenced by relevant standards - or simply best practice in your particular field or industry. Above all else, it must be simple to understand and easy to use. There are some straightforward questions you can ask yourself, to help check you've picked the right process.
Getting people working collaboratively Once you've decided how you'd like people to work, the next step is to think about what you can do to ensure your team collaborates in a constructive way. The key to this usually lies in getting everyone actively involved and working together from the outset. It's important to establish an immediate rapport or you'll be facing a long uphill struggle. It's impossible to provide a formula for getting a facilitated session off to a great start, since the number of variables involved makes each one unique. However, there are some practical measures worth considering that can improve your chances of leading a productive session.
Improving your chances of a productive session
Find ways of demonstrating that you're interested in everyone's views. Reassure those who feel uncomfortable about speaking up; establish there's no such thing as a 'dumb question'. As a final thought on getting people working well together , never underestimate the power of fun! You should always look for ways of making your facilitated sessions interesting, perhaps even entertaining at times but without appearing frivolous. You'll know from personal experience what a difference it makes to work on something that's captured your interest. This is particularly true where creative processes are concerned. After all, it's pretty difficult to come up with an inspirational idea when you're trying to stifle a yawn. Introducing a degree of challenge Once people get working together and build up a head of steam, it can be easy for them to get too focused and to develop tunnel vision. They become blinded to other possibilities and options, especially if some strong personalities begin to dominate. So a super project manager needs to be prepared to counterbalance this by introducing a degree of challenge from time to time. It's important for you to use your facilitation role to make sure that ideas and proposed decisions stand up to scrutiny, before they're finalized. You'll need to do this in a constructive way to maintain the goodwill of the participants, but once they see that you're helping them to improve the quality of their ideas, they'll be inclined to cooperate. Typically , a few, well-chosen, open questions will get your colleagues thinking that bit harder. You can encourage them to look at a problem or decision from different perspectives. Suggest time is spent looking at the drawbacks to a preferred option, as well as its positive points. Think about alternative solutions, however good your first idea seems. Keep pressing for the team to take a fresh viewpoint. By introducing a degree of challenge in your facilitation you'll be testing the resilience of the ideas put forward. It's far better to prod and probe when you can easily fix any shortcomings. TIP: When someone says, 'Just to play devil's advocate for a minute. ...' it usually means that they don't agree with what's being said but don't feel they can say so outright. Providing some initial ideas: Most of the time, facilitation is about managing the process and letting the participants do the hard work. However, there are some situations where you should roll up your sleeves and contribute directly to the discussion itself. For example:
Sometimes you'll need to prepare material that can be used to spark discussion. This is because people usually find it easier to work from an initial idea than from scratch - even if that idea turns out to be not that great. It's important that you introduce this preparatory work as a starting point for discussion and not as a done deal. That way, you'll maintain the motivation of your contributors - which might waiver if they sense they've been presented with a fait accompli. It's not always possible to prepare material ahead of time. For these occasions, or where a stalemate is developing, here are a few, easy-to use techniques worth having up your sleeve:
Facilitation techniques for all occasions As well as there being some useful guiding principles behind facilitation, there are plenty of practical techniques available to project managers. Whatever you're looking to achieve, you can be sure that there are some handy tools out there that will make your life easier. You don't even need to be a paid-up member of the Facilitators' Union to use them! There are three facilitation techniques that we use most frequently . We like them because they're both simple and effective. They're also good, general-purpose tools. Top three facilitation techniques for project managers
These techniques can be used in the three common project situations we highlighted earlier on: generating ideas, solving problems and reaching agreement. We'll outline how each technique can be used in these scenarios. However, you'll soon see that they're more widely applicable and can easily be combined in all sorts of useful ways. Generating ideas The creator of the brainstorming technique, advertising executive, is famously quoted as saying: 'It is easier to tone down a wild idea than to think up a new one.' Brainstorming is based on this principle. The aim of brainstorming is to generate lots of ideas to work from - with the emphasis initially on quantity rather than quality . Brainstorming is designed to get everyone in a group contributing. It also encourages participants to build on each other's ideas. Brainstorming is a great technique to use when you need a comprehensive set of ideas in a relatively short space of time. It also has the advantage of working well with both small and large groups of people. Simple guide to brainstorming
Brainstorming is, without doubt, the most widely used and misused facilitation technique. The most common mistake is to allow discussion and evaluation of ideas as they are recorded. This interrupts the free flow of ideas. Part of the success of brainstorming comes from people building on previous ideas, often by free association. So it's essential to emphasize the 'no discussion' rule at the beginning of any brainstorming session and then to enforce it throughout. We're keen on one useful variation on the conventional brain storming technique. Sometimes we ask participants to record all of their ideas on sticky notes. When everyone has finished, these are then stuck on a wall and common ideas grouped together. This approach cuts out any opportunity for debating ideas before they are recorded and also stops the whole group following just one line of thinking. It's worth remembering that brainstorming is about generating ideas. It doesn't help with analyzing the ideas once they're recorded. So you'll usually want to follow up a brainstorming session with a technique that organizes and evaluates the ideas you've collected. Consensus building It can be difficult and time consuming to get individuals to make decisions when a number of competing factors need to be taken into account. This is especially true where the pros and cons are finely balanced, or people have taken entrenched positions and feelings are running high. Even a super project manager will regularly come across these situations during projects. In fact, you'd be right to start worrying if your team was in total agreement all of the time! Generally, healthy debate leads to an agreed decision. However, there are times when things are going nowhere fast and it's time to introduce an objective and systematic approach to decision making. It's also important to do this in a way that leads your participants towards some kind of group consensus. Our favorite by far is the criteria-based decision making technique. It's quite a mouthful, yet very effective and easy to apply. Simple guide to criteria-based decision making
This technique's big selling point is that it breaks up decision making into simple, logical steps. The participants aren't able to argue in vague or emotive terms about what's right or wrong. Reasonable debate can only be had on whether the criteria being used need some refinement or whether the scores need adjusting. There's nothing wrong with this fine-tuning - even after the initial scoring - as long as it's not used to fix the outcome! Criteria-based decision making also builds consensus step-by-step. First, it gets the participants to agree on what factors really matter most in making the decision. This is an important step in its own right. Then the technique requires agreement on each individual score. So by the time the final result emerges after the last step, no one is in a position to dismiss an option that's scored well or to urge the group to go for something that's languishing at the bottom of the list. TIP: When consensus building, don't automatically select whatever scores best without further debate. Review the results of the exercise and discuss what lies behind the scores before making a final decision. Solving problems: There are only three certainties in life: death, taxes and problems on projects. Your project will be peppered with dilemmas, but the biggest problem with problems is that it's easy to jump to hasty conclusions. You end up trying to fix what looks like the real issue, but which later turns out to be little more than a sideshow; worrying about a small wet patch on the bedroom ceiling when there's a gaping hole in the roof. Root-cause analysis is a really effective way of getting to the heart of a problem. It helps you to separate out root causes from symptoms. This is important for long-term success, as a super project manager wants to deal with underlying issues and not just to implement quick, short-term fixes. You can make root-cause analysis as complicated as you like, but we favor use of a simple approach based on asking the question: 'why?' For this technique to be successful, it's critical that you start with a problem statement that describes exactly the right issue. Your problem statement should be kept factual, objective and without any hint of underlying causes. We've found that this technique consistently highlights what lies at the root of a problem. Then it's up to you and your team to decide on the most appropriate, cost-effective way forward. More often than not the solution lies in dealing with the root cause. However, a note of caution here: there are times when dealing with the root cause costs far more than dealing with the symptom. So you'll need to be pragmatic about the level at which you tackle a problem. Perhaps you could replace a few missing tiles on the roof rather than lay a completely new one! - - - Simple guide to root-cause analysis 1 Produce a statement that defines the problem you want to work on. For example, 'paper is peeling off the ceiling in the master bedroom'. Write it at the top of a flipchart or whiteboard. 2 Ask your participants why this problem has occurred. Encourage them to focus on the immediate causes. 3 Write their answers in a line across the flipchart or whiteboard, underneath your original problem statement. 4 Now take each new statement in turn and ask them 'why?' 5 Add the responses under the corresponding statement. 6 Repeat the process. 7 Stop when you start finding that causes are largely repetitive or they're things you have to accept as a fact of life. For example, 'because the house is a hundred years old'. 8 Get the participants to review the underlying root causes and to agree which should be targeted as project priorities. --- Complementing techniques The three techniques we've described provide you with an excellent grounding for dealing with most common project situations. Two of the reasons we like them so much is because they complement each other and they're also very easy to combine. There'll be times when new ideas need to be generated but people have different opinions on which are best, and so you'll need to get people with different views to reach agreement. On other occasions, when a problem needs to be solved and you've identified the root cause, you might be stumped for a solution. You might view this as a situation when new ideas need to be generated. - Combining facilitation techniques: an example Imagine that our house-building project has discovered a massive cost overrun and this looks set to get worse. Your construction team needs to get to the bottom of what's gone wrong and find ways of rectifying the problem. You kick things off with a root-cause analysis to identify the factors that have contributed to the miscalculation. Having understood the underlying causes, you then run a brainstorming session to come up with ideas on how to turn the situation around. Once you've identified the most promising suggestions and developed them a little more, you use criteria-based decision making to pinpoint the top two or three ideas for a final team assessment. This combination of techniques is not the only way to reach agreement but it's structured, disciplined and highly likely to produce the right outcome. -- After a while, you'll be surprised at how often you use all these facilitation techniques together - sometimes instinctively without even thinking. Once you feel confident with using our favorite techniques, you'll find it straightforward to master others. In Summary Facilitation is all about helping your project to be creative when it needs to, to come to decisions when it should do and to remove roadblocks when it gets stuck. This gets to the very heart of super project management as facilitation skills are essential for the day-to-day running of your project. They're also invaluable when tensions develop and you need to get people working collaboratively again. For any situation there are some golden rules to stick to. First, take the lead in getting the right people together and provide them with a suit able process to work through. Then make sure that everyone contributes, not just those with the loudest voices. Once your team is beavering away, help it to reach the correct conclusions and to make sound decisions. Always be prepared to provide a bit of inspiration where this is in short supply and to give your team a head start where you can. If you've mastered brainstorming, root-cause analysis and criteria-based decision making, you'll always have practical facilitation tools to use in any project situation. Be imaginative in combining and adapting these, and supplementing them with other techniques you find work for you. Facilitation skills give you the means to get the most out of collaborative working. They also arm you with techniques for dealing with difficult people situations. So even if facilitation doesn't feature in your formal job description, work hard to make it one of your core skills. Facilitation skills: _ You're halfway to success once you've provided a process that's spot on. _ Don't leave home without your tool bag of simple and effective facilitation techniques. _ It's not a crime to make working together fun and interesting! Start your sessions with an icebreaker or something suitably invigorating. _ Go in search of opportunities to practice your facilitation skills. There's no substitute for hands-on experience. _ A super project manager is a super facilitator. |
Top of Page | More PM Articles | Prev: Super-productive project meetings | Next: Using lessons learned from past projects | Info-Source.us |